On Feb 12, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Would it be useful to have the RSSI column display:
>
> the RSSI number, as is, if "RSSI" as a raw number, rather than as a signal strength in dB, was supplied;
>
> the dB number, followed by "dB", if dB from some arbitrary (unknown) reference point was supplied;
>
> the dB number, followed by "dBm", if dBm was supplied
...and as a percentage if that's what it is.
Yes, it would, and, in fact, except for the "as a percentage" and, for the PPI header the "followed by "dBm"", that's exactly what we've been doing. I've fixed those items.