Hi,
Sorry if I was misleading. I didn’t state that I could write the patch for “ipip” . I meant that I could compile if the required code is supplied. I thought
it was a easy for you to supply the required code. From your recent post I understand that I was wrong. So I’ll try to use what you suggested as a capture filter. (Thanks for the filter by the way)
But I wonder how “tcpdump” started not supporting this , as it was working fine on the previous server.
Any ideas ?
Thanks,
ilker
From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Sake Blok
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:26 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] tcpdump forum ?
On 28 aug 2012, at 13:11, Aktuna, Ilker, Vodafone Turkey wrote:
Thanks for your answers. I have both tcpdump and libpcap sources to compile. If you can tell me where I should edit for adding "ipip" to the source, I could try that.
But as you say ""it won't help you today" , I didn't understand. Why ? Is it too difficult to add it or is there another reason ?
Well, maybe literally it would help you today of you are able to write the patch today. But it was an _expression_ used to indicate that it does not help you with your current version of tcpdump. And since I did not know whether you were
able to write the patch, I thought I'd help you out with a capture filter that does the job...