[Eric Ewanco <Eric.Ewanco@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah.  That makes sense now that you say it but I didn't make the connection.  Thanks for clarifying; I'll pursue that.  Sorry for the confusion.

Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 5:51 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] tshark overrun?

Hi,

You are aware that it's libpcap that does the actual capturing?
See the keynote given by Steve McCanne, 'the guy who made it', at
SharkFest'11:
http://sharkfest.wireshark.org/sharkfest.11/
Dive into that stuff to see what intricate details come into play here.

Thanks,
Jaap

On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:51:42 +0000, Eric Ewanco wrote:
> I'm seeing a very strange problem and I'm curious to see if anyone has 
> run across it.
>
> We're trying to do a simple loopback test: Generate 1000 UDP packets 
> using pacgen at 50 pps, loop them back, and count them with tshark 
> (1.4.2-1.1-1).
>
> The problem is under most circumstances tshark ignores about 379 
> packets, that is to say, it counts 621 packets and stops, even though 
> the packets are received at the interface. Often it will work one 
> time, and then have trouble on subsequent runs.
>
> The problem appears to be timing related (see below). My version of 
> tshark can't seem to handle bursts of tightly-spaced packets under 
> some circumstances. Is there a known bug with a source patch that 
> doesn't require upgrading our Linux distribution (OpenSuSE 11.1)?
>
> The "lost" packets are counted by ifconfig and not accounted for by 
> any of the dropped counters in /proc/net/snmp or other places in 
> /proc/net, but tshark doesn't recognize them. The capture file 
> corresponds to the printed counts; the lost packets do not show up 
> there. I can even do a capture on the transmit side and find more 
> packets received on the receive side than are counted by tshark on the 
> transmit side. However, if I monitor both transmit and receive, the 
> dynamics change and it almost works; I lose only about a dozen 
> packets.
>
> If I use tcpdump instead of tshark, everything is copacetic. It also 
> works fine when I transmit an identical packet to tshark using a 
> different program (hping3). Dumpcap works better but still loses 
> packets on several runs (drops of 28, 12, 70 out of five runs of 1000 
> packets).
>
> Command line:
>
> tshark -i eth5 udp -c 1000 -w /tmp/eth5.cap
>
> It seems to be there has to be some sort of timing issue. According to 
> the capture log, the first 50 packets are received over the course of 
> 470 us about 5-15 us apart. Then the pacgen transmitter waits about 
> one second 100 us and transmits another 50. When I do a flood ping 
> (which works fine), the rate is much lower, every 200 ms or so. If I 
> do a flood ping with hping3 (which works, at least until I get to 
> hundreds of thousands of packets, and then it loses only 0.05%), it 
> sometimes has a similar gap to pacgen, but it doesn't sustain it and 
> leaves large gaps pacgen does not leave. I did notice that if I slow 
> pacgen down to 25 or 10 pps, it works more reliably, although even at 
> ten pps I've occasionally seen a loss.
>
> Platform is a customized OpenSuSE 11.1 on Intel. I verified this using 
> stock Wireshark on a stock OpenSuSE 11.3 laptop with similar results.
>
> We've tested 0.10.13, 1.2.4, 1.2.8, and 1.4.4-0.2-1 in addition to 
> 1.4.2-1.1-1. Because of its dependencies we can't use a later 
> wireshark; but if we can cherry-pick a fix we may do that. Using
> 0.10.13 and 1.2.4 seems to work fine; the other two fail.
>
> I checked the bug database for bugs in any state with summary or 
> comment with search terms "burst", "drops", "dropped", "overrun", 
> "loses", and "lost". If you can suggest any others (I find this is a 
> difficult bug to come up with keywords for) feel free to do so.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> bl-s1r1-24:~/hardware_test # tshark -v
>
> TShark 1.4.2
>
> Copyright 1998-2010 Gerald Combs  and contributors.
>
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is 
> NO
>
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR 
> PURPOSE.
>
> Compiled (64-bit) with GLib 2.18.2, with libpcap 0.9-PRE-CVS, with 
> libz 1.2.3,
>
> with POSIX capabilities (Linux), with libpcre (version unknown), 
> without SMI,
>
> without c-ares, with ADNS, with Lua 5.1, without Python, with GnuTLS 
> 2.4.1, with
>
> Gcrypt 1.4.1, with MIT Kerberos, without GeoIP.
>
> Running on Linux 2.6.34.4-gb05, with libpcap version 0.9-PRE-CVS, with 
> libz
>
> 1.2.3.
>
> Built using gcc 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291].
>

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe