["damker" <damker@xxxxxxxx>]

There are two fields use the same filter( rsl.msg_type ), even though they are coded as the same, but they are not a same field, it would be best to use different filter name in Wireshark.

 

 

 

There are two fields use same filter(gsm_old.localvalue), would you please change the second one as gsm_old.localerrorvalue or other?

By the way, in the second picture, why the local value decode as “unknown”, and the info column is “insertsubscriberdata”. I just change to Wireshark 1.7.0, in early version it’s ok.

 

 

 

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 代表 Stig Bj?rlykke
发送时间: 2011年11月11日 21:28
收件人: Community support list for Wireshark
主题: Re: [Wireshark-users] different field use same filter

 

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:30 AM, damker <damker@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The attachment is a sample.

 

Fixed in revision 39794.

 

> The same situation can be seen in rsl, gsm_map, camel and so on.

 

Did you find more errors like the one you reported in the attached image?

 

 

--

Stig Bjørlykke

___________________________________________________________________________

Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users

Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users

             mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

Attachment: error report.pcap
Description: Binary data

Attachment: gsm_map_localvalue.pcap
Description: Binary data