Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 65, Issue 28

From: alao adedamola <jayteealao@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 07:20:58 +0100
On 10/29/11, wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
> 	wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	wireshark-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: ISDN Layer 3 decode (Guy Harris)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:08:26 -0700
> From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Community support list for Wireshark
> 	<wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] ISDN Layer 3 decode
> Message-ID: <58981B20-2A92-464E-A352-AC6C520F550D@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> On Oct 28, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Keith French wrote:
>
>> I think the two attachments should be self explanatory with the notes I
>> have added to the bug:-
>>
>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6483
>
> Thanks.  I've updated the Aethra-reading code based on the new captures, and
> have asked in the bug if you have additional captures with interesting
> information for further reverse engineering.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
> End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 65, Issue 28
> ***********************************************
>