On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:55, Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2010, at 6:48 AM, Ryan Lynch wrote:
>
>> If it's a bug, I assume it's related to some assumptions about
>> null-terminated strings in C.
>
> It's related to the fact that libwireshark - as used both by TShark and Wireshark - currently represents all strings in packets as C strings. They should probably be represented as a counted UTF-8 string or as a counted byte sequence plus a character encoding or something such as that.
Thanks for the answer, Guy. That makes sense.
A search through the bug tracker and found this:
* https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1372
Sounds like a pretty big project. Do you know whether there's any
active development effort going into this, right now?
-Ryan