Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] ssl.handshake and ring buffer capture

Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:39:09 -0400
That's what I was considering but was hoping I wouldn't have to. Thank you for tour suggestion

John Modlin
John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(859)324-1560 cell

On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Sake Blok <sake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 15 jul 2010, at 14:25, John Modlin wrote:

I’ve setup tshark to do a nightly capture and include ssl traffic. The decryption is working great. The problem I have is I’m keeping files to a 50mb size so the files are manage able in wireshark to view and filter. The captures Can be several hundred mb. The decryption works great in the 1st capture file from the ring buffer where the Ssl.handshake info exists, but the subsequent files from the ring buffer don’t have that information in it of course, And consequently wireshark does not then decrypt the subsequent files.
Is there an eloquent way to handle this?

You could extract each individual SSL session (including sessions that reuse the negotiated keys) to a file of it's own and then do decryption on the new files. Of course you lose the depency between the sessions, but having both the unencrypted form next to the integral tracefiles will still give you a pretty good view on things.

The extraction can be automated with a script, but it is not trivial (because of the session reuse).

Cheers,


Sake


___________________________________________________________________________


Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe