Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] FCIP issues with SAN replication
From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:58:07 -0700
If I add a column for TCP bytes in flight the number never goes above 29568 for "SNA-small.pcap" and 2720 for "DFW-small.pcap". Do you have window scaling enabled? Chandler, Mel wrote: > Greetings all, > > > > My company is attempting to perform replication from one HP EVA SAN > array to another HP EVA SAN array across the WAN. We have a metro > Ethernet connection between the two with one Gigabit of shared > bandwidth. We share the bandwidth with our other business units, with > no QoS in place, but we have been told that the pipe has never been > completely saturated, and we’re not rate limited. The SAN arrays are on > 4Gbps fiber channel brocade switches. There are two devices called > MPX110’s that send the data from fiber channel to Ethernet. Each MPX > has redundancy groups they perform replication for, and although they > have two Ethernet and two fiber channel ports on each, we only use one > on each. Each MPX110 has a path they perform replication for to their > counter parts on the other side. It is my understanding they negotiate > a tunnel between them, Fiber Channel over IP. They’re each on their own > 6509 which have a uplinks to a 3750 and that goes across the metro > Ethernet to a 3560 on the other side, then up to a 3560 acting as the > core and out to two 3560’s with an MPX on each one. > > > > Now the problem, although we have one gigabit of bandwidth, they’ll only > use about 13Mbps of it each, we’ve verified this with iperf. Each > connection we’ll only take 13Mbps of bandwidth, parallel tests show each > connection gets 13Mbps of bandwidth. The HP engineer told us that at >>5Mbps we get approximately 1.3Mbps of actually data, which means that > FCIP has 80% over head? Can that be right? The big huge problem is > that after running for several hours they’ll eventually just die and > have to rebooted to start replicating again. They’re already on the > latest firmware (2.4.4.1). The only error we get from the statistic > screen of the MPX’s says they’re getting TCP timeouts. > > > > I’ve performed captures on both sides’ MPXs’ and the errors I see in a > 60 sec sample are FCP malformed packets (~4300), duplicate ACK’s (~41), > previous segment lost (~3), fast retransmission (~3). When HP was > questioned about the FCP malformed packets they stated that they use a > proprietary protocol and that wireshark wouldn’t be able to decode it. > I’ve since searched for this protocol but can find no references to it > anywhere. The other errors seem so minor and few it would be hard to > believe that they’re impacting the data stream that much if at all. > > > > I’ll include a small sample of the captures, if it lets me. > > > > Thanks in advance for your assistance. > > > > Chandler Bing > > > > ****************************************************************************************** > This message may contain confidential or proprietary information intended only for the use of the > addressee(s) named above or may contain information that is legally privileged. If you are > not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended addressee, > you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing or copying this message is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please immediately notify us by > replying to the message and delete the original message and any copies immediately thereafter. > > Thank you. > ****************************************************************************************** > FACLD > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users > mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] FCIP issues with SAN replication
- From: Chandler, Mel
- [Wireshark-users] FCIP issues with SAN replication
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] codesign or cryptographic hash like MD5 hash for Wireshark 1.2.8 install package
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Help on MAC-LTE Decoder
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-users] FCIP issues with SAN replication
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] FCIP issues with SAN replication
- Index(es):