Exactly. Thanks.
On 6/22/10, bart sikkes <b.sikkes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thanx!
>>
>> I passed on your comment. Maybe what I should do next is point him to
>> this News group.
>
> and what if the malware uses the port(s) you are going to exclude?
> specially with malware i would be careful with what you call noise,
> that noise can be used to hide the malware.
>
> bart
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>
> mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>