[Phil Paradis <Phil.Paradis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Try rebooting (or restarting the NPF driver) after installing the loopback; I’ve found that newly added interfaces don’t always show up if you don’t do this.

 

--

Phillip R. Paradis | Network Engineer | United Tote | 2724 River Green Circle | Louisville | KY | Phone: +1 (502) 509-7445

 

From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aaron Stromas
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 12:22 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] newbie question

 

The trouble is that although I installed and configured the loopback interface (it shows as "connected"), WhiteShark does not list it. :-(

-a

On 28 April 2010 11:49, M K <gedropi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Within Preferences>Protocols>HTTP do you have the correct ports
listed?  Are you able to filter on tcp.port==8080 alone first before
making it into a compound filter?  If I am remembering correctly,
after installing the virtual 127.0.0.1 from MS, I think  that you need
the correct interface to do the capture.

On 4/28/10, Aaron Stromas <passogiau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am trying to capture HTTP traffic on my local box. The HTTP server is
> listening on port 8080, and the client (browser) also running on the local
> box submits requests to http://localhost:8080/...
>
> I've tried this filter
>
> http and (ip.dst_host==localhost || ip.dst==127.0.0.1)
>
> and this one
>
> tcp.port==8080 and (ip.dst_host==localhost || ip.dst==127.0.0.1)
>
> but nothing get captured!
>
> I expect, I'm missing something basic but what?
> TIA
>
>
>
> --
> Aaron Stromas
>

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

--
Aaron Stromas