sorry, I was a mistake, it is eth1 and eth2, the question still remains ;-)
eth1 -> IP=192.168.1.10/24
eth2 -> IP=192.168.1.11/24
cheers
jp
----- Original Message ----
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 1:22:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] 2 IP addresses on 1 machine
Hi,
Reading from the configuration data, in short:
eth0 -> IP=192.168.1.10/24
eth1 -> IP=192.168.1.11/24
So, there is not eth2 in this list. The command line "tshark -i eth1" to capture
traffic to 192.168.1.11 is perfectly oke.
Thanx,
Jaap
Juan Perez wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a linux machine with two physical NICs and each NIC has its own IP address belonging to the same network.
> Example:
> eth0 --> 192.168.1.10 255.255.255.0
> eth1 --> 192.168.1.11 255.255.255.0
>
>
> [root@proxy2 network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0
> # Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit Ethernet
> DEVICE=eth0
> BOOTPROTO=none
> BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
> HWADDR=00:19:b9:f2:f3:f4
> IPADDR=192.168.1.10
> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> NETWORK=192.168.1.0
> ONBOOT=yes
> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
> TYPE=Ethernet
> [root@proxy2 network-scripts]#
>
> [root@proxy2 network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth1
> # Intel Corporation 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper)
> DEVICE=eth1
> ONBOOT=yes
> BOOTPROTO=none
> HWADDR=00:04:23:e6:8b:17
> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> IPADDR=192.168.1.11
> GATEWAY=192.168.1.1
> TYPE=Ethernet
> NETWORK=192.168.1.0
> BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
> [root@proxy2 network-scripts]#
>
> I have 2 apps, each one listen on 1 IP:
>
> app 1 listens only on 192.168.1.10
> app 2 listens only on 192.168.1.11.
>
> When I run tshark this way "tshark -i eth2 -S" and packets destined to IP 2 arrive I do no see them, I have to run tshark like this: "tshark -i eth1 -S".
> In summary, I have to run "tshark -i eth1" for me to see the packets that fo to IP 2. When I do it that way I can see the packets from any ext IP to the IP 2 192.168.1.11.
>
> This should not be. Is there anything wrong with my NICs configuration?
>
> cheers
>
> jp
>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe