["Nivaldo Júnior" <nivaldomjunior@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Ok thank you! I'm using rtpbreak and developed an perl script to
generate the audios on demand. It's working.



2008/10/22 miguel olivares varela <klica_sk8@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> You can use rtpbreak in works really nice but it's only for Linux, i'm not
> sure than you can use thark in order to generate all  the audios.
>
>
>
>> From: wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 34
>> To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:37:31 -0700
>>
>> Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
>> wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> wireshark-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Sniffer for VoIP (j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx)
>> 2. Re: Can Wireshark query the captured data? (j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx)
>> 3. Re: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 33 ( ??? )
>> 4. Leopard and AirPort, only my own packets (Marco De Vitis)
>> 5. Re: Leopard and AirPort, only my own packets (Guy Harris)
>> 6. Re: Leopard and AirPort, only my own packets (Marco De Vitis)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:09:48 +0200
>> From: j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Sniffer for VoIP
>> To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Message-ID: <481B206B00090D17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>>
>> Hi Nivaldo
>>
>> You can use Tshark, the command-line tool.
>> Or take a look at message d.d. Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:09:46 +0200
>> Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Running Wireshark as windows
>> service
>>
>>
>> Grtz
>> Joan
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:15:45 -0300 Nivaldo J?nior wrote:
>> > I need a sniffer for VoIP. I'm testing VoIPong but some calls are not
>> > detected. I tested with wireshark and all calls are detected and i can
>> > generate the waves, but i need a command line system to be running in
>> > background and generating all audios.
>> > I have some resources for this project, so if someone knows how to do
>> > that, please contact me as soon as possible.
>> > My MSN is junior@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and my Skype is nivaldomjunior.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:15:42 +0200
>> From: j.snelders@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Can Wireshark query the captured data?
>> To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Message-ID: <481B206B00090D32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>>
>> Hi Abdu,
>>
>> You'll find a lot of usefull information in the user guide:
>> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html/
>>
>> In a nutshell...
>> Add a column to display the packete length(bytes)
>> Edit - Preferences - User interface - Columns
>> Select : New
>> Properties:
>> Title: change the title to Length
>> Format: select Packete length(bytes)
>> Apply - OK
>>
>>
>> Use capture and/or display filters.
>> http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureFilters
>> http://wiki.wireshark.org/DisplayFilters
>>
>> You can use a capture filter to capture only http traffic
>> Capture - Option - Capture filter
>> select: Filter name: HTTP TCP port (80) Filter string: tcp port http
>>
>> You can use filters to capture traffic to/from specific host:
>> capture filter:
>> to/from: host 192.168.100.44
>> to: dst host 192.168.100.44
>> from: src host 192.168.100.44
>>
>> display filter:
>> to/from : ip.addr == 192.168.100.44
>> to : ip.dst == 192.168.100.44
>> from : ip.src == 192.168.100.44
>>
>>
>> While capturing you for instance can look at:
>> Analyze - Expert Info Composite
>> Statistics - Conversations
>>
>> In the "Conversations Window" you can right-click on a
>> interesting conversation to apply a filter.
>>
>> Hope this helps
>> Joan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:03:21 +0000 abdu bukres wrote:
>> > I have been using Wireshark in a simple usage looking at the data.
>> >
>> > Can Wireshark be used to query the data a bit like SQL, something like:
>> > List the top 10 ip addresses which caused the most number
>> > of hits or tcp traffic during the last 10 minutes?
>> >
>> > I don't know if Wireshark can capture number of bytes sent
>> > out in http responses, so can it list which ip addresses are causing
>> > a lot of outbound traffic?
>> >
>> > I would like to query the data captured by Wireshark and
>> > query it like a database.
>> >
>> > Simple examples can get me going fast.
>> >
>> > If Wireshark can't do it, any ideas for other sniffers?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:59:32 +0800
>> From: " ??? " <cduter@xxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue
>> 33
>> To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Message-ID: <20081022010543.5B79C476BB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>>
>> wireshark-users-request,???
>>
>> good idear! The Wireshark can capture the data and store it in the
>> database,good ,good.But i think that the wrieshark can do it right now,i am
>> writing a c program to analyze the pcap files ,it can get the detail data
>> and store them in the databses ,which make i can find the top ip :)
>>
>>
>>
>> ???
>> cduter@xxxxxx
>> 2008-10-22
>>
>> ======= 2008-10-22 03:00 12:00:05 ???????: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 29,
>> Issue 33=======
>>
>> Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to
>> wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> wireshark-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Can Wireshark query the captured data? (Breno Jacinto)
>> 2. Sniffer for VoIP ( Nivaldo J?nior )
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:30:36 -0300
>> From: "Breno Jacinto"
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Can Wireshark query the captured data?
>> To: "Community support list for Wireshark"
>>
>> Message-ID:
>> <2ced936d0810201730o6f4b3c68off637e5fc0338456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was just skimming through all the documentation available at
>> http://www.wireshark.org/bibliography.html, and I think the
>> video-article "Advanced I/O Graphing" may be of your interest. Take a
>> look at http://novellevents.novell.com/t/2261821/56771533/6387/0/
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> 2008/10/20 abdu bukres :
>> >
>> > I have been using Wireshark in a simple usage looking at the data.
>> >
>> > Can Wireshark be used to query the data a bit like SQL, something like:
>> >
>> > List the top 10 ip addresses which caused the most number of hits or tcp
>> > traffic during the last 10 minutes?
>> >
>> > I don't know if Wireshark can capture number of bytes sent out in http
>> > responses, so can it list which ip addresses are causing a lot of
>> > outbound
>> > traffic?
>> >
>> > I would like to query the data captured by Wireshark and query it like a
>> > database.
>> >
>> > Simple examples can get me going fast.
>> >
>> > If Wireshark can't do it, any ideas for other sniffers?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Abdu
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > When your life is on the go?take your life with you. Try Windows
>> > Mobile(R)
>> > today
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wireshark-users mailing list
>> > Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> :: Breno Jacinto ::
>> :: breno - at - gprt.ufpe.br ::
>> :: FingerPrint ::
>> 2F15 8A61 F566 E442 8581
>> E3C0 EFF4 E202 74B7 7484
>> :: Persistir no dif?cil ? a ?nica maneira de torn?-lo f?cil algum dia. ::
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:15:45 -0300
>> From: " Nivaldo J?nior "
>> Subject: [Wireshark-users] Sniffer for VoIP
>> To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need a sniffer for VoIP. I'm testing VoIPong but some calls are not
>> detected. I tested with wireshark and all calls are detected and i can
>> generate the waves, but i need a command line system to be running in
>> background and generating all audios.
>> I have some resources for this project, so if someone knows how to do
>> that, please contact me as soon as possible.
>> My MSN is junior@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and my Skype is nivaldomjunior.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Nivaldo J?nior
>> nivaldomjunior@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireshark-users mailing list
>> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>>
>>
>> End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 33
>> ***********************************************
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20081022/201a2ad4/attachment.htm
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:52:36 +0200
>> From: Marco De Vitis <starless@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [Wireshark-users] Leopard and AirPort, only my own packets
>> To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Message-ID: <gdlmfk$nht$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm doing some tests on my own wifi network, which is protected using
>> WPA Personal.
>>
>> I have a Windows notebook and a MacBook running OSX 10.5.5. I want to
>> try running Wireshark on the MacBook for sniffing traffic happening from
>> the Win machine.
>>
>> I connect both machines to the network, then start Wireshark on the Mac
>> (the binary download for Intel machines on the official Wireshark web
>> site, installed as the docs recommend), start capturing in promiscuous
>> mode, and then try doing something on the Win machine, like browsing the
>> web or downloading mail, but this activity is not logged: I can only see
>> traffic from the MacBook itself.
>>
>> I've read related docs in the wiki a couple of times, and I'm a bit
>> confused now. As far as I understand, it should all work fine with my
>> setup. Am I wrong? Am I missing anything?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Ciao,
>> Marco.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:54:21 -0700
>> From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Leopard and AirPort, only my own
>> packets
>> To: Community support list for Wireshark
>> <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Message-ID: <E3F38D3F-57B3-4457-A9DA-029B25A9842D@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>>
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Marco De Vitis wrote:
>>
>> > I'm doing some tests on my own wifi network, which is protected using
>> > WPA Personal.
>> >
>> > I have a Windows notebook and a MacBook running OSX 10.5.5. I want to
>> > try running Wireshark on the MacBook for sniffing traffic happening
>> > from
>> > the Win machine.
>>
>> It might be that the AirPort adapter on your MacBook will only capture
>> traffic from other machines on your network when in monitor mode (on
>> Leopard, to go into monitor mode you currently have to select a "link-
>> layer header type" other than Ethernet), even in promiscuous mode. I
>> think some (perhaps all) wireless adapters will not actually work
>> promiscuously on protected networks as they can't decrypt traffic to
>> or from other machines; they'll capture the traffic in monitor mode,
>> but, in order to see that traffic decrypted, you'll need to provide
>> the password for the network *and* capture the initial setup:
>>
>> http://wiki.wireshark.org/HowToDecrypt802.11
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:37:15 +0200
>> From: Marco De Vitis <starless@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Leopard and AirPort, only my own
>> packets
>> To: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Message-ID: <gdn6pr$sng$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> Il 22-10-2008 10:54, Guy Harris ha scritto:
>>
>> > Leopard, to go into monitor mode you currently have to select a "link-
>> > layer header type" other than Ethernet), even in promiscuous mode. I
>>
>> Indeed, I tried the other two link-layer header types available, "IEEE
>> 802.11 Wireless LAN" and "IEEE 802.11 plus AVS WLAN header", but I
>> couldn't interpret the results: it appeared that some data packets were
>> captured, but the seemed to be encrypted or something.
>>
>> > or from other machines; they'll capture the traffic in monitor mode,
>> > but, in order to see that traffic decrypted, you'll need to provide
>> > the password for the network *and* capture the initial setup:
>> >
>> > http://wiki.wireshark.org/HowToDecrypt802.11
>>
>> Ah, thanks, I missed this. I actually wondered if the captured traffic
>> was encrypted or not (see above), but didn't see mentions of this aspect
>> in the wiki (http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/WLAN).
>> I'll try when I get back home.
>>
>> --
>> Ciao,
>> Marco.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireshark-users mailing list
>> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>>
>>
>> End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 29, Issue 34
>> ***********************************************
>
>
> ________________________________
> Discover the new Windows Vista Learn more!
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>



-- 
Nivaldo Júnior
nivaldomjunior@xxxxxxxxx