[Colin O'Flynn <coflynn@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

> The second is the cleaner solution, but is probably more work.

Yes - I can see how the first one is a lot less work! It appears to be just 
adding the line:

	dissector_add("ethertype",  ETHERTYPE_802154, ieee802154_handle);

Which does seem quite easy. However - would such a thing be accepted by the 
Wireshark developers?

It's late here though, so will try compiling that change in the morning to see 
if it works!

Regards,

  -Colin