Guy Harris wrote:
> That's not a release we ever distributed. Somebody built that
> themselves, after tweaking the version number string (the 1.x releases
> occurred after the name change, so no 1.x release we ever distributed
> would call itself "Ethereal"), so we have no idea how it differs from
> any release built from our code - whoever built that release might,
> for example, have changed stuff in the SSL code.
>
> Does your co-worker know where that version of Ethereal came from?
The version in the trunk was set to 1.1.0 between revisions 18062 and 18674
during the first attempt at a 1.0 release. This could have been an automated
build from that time.