> <mailto:
jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You're trying to use a read filter as display filter for a running
> capture.
> That is not supported. You can use -R with -r.
>
> You might want to file a improvement request on bugzilla for that.
>
> Thanx,
> Jaap
>
>
> Vinay Chilakamarri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After many attempts at this, I couldn't understand why WireShark
> > disregards the "-R" argument. I worked with tshark with valid display
> > filters and passed them with "-R" argument and they were working as
> > expected. But when I try the same with wireshark, no matter how I
> tried
> > supplying the filter with "-R" argument, it displays all of the
> packets.
> > I tried this in windows, while it doesn't filter anything:
> >
> > wireshark -f "udp port 37112" -i2 -k
> -R"(wlan.addr==00:2E:E0:76:5D:83)"
> >
> > wireshark -f "udp port 37112"
> -R"wlan.addr==\"00:2E:E0:76:5D:83"" -i2 -k
> >
> > wireshark -f "udp port 37112" -R'wlan.addr==00:2E:E0:76:5D:83'
> -i2 -k
> >
> > wireshark -f "udp port 37112" -R wlan.addr==00:2E:E0:76:5D:83
> -i2 -k
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users