Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Fwd: sequence number and packet id

From: "Fabiana moreno" <fvmoreno@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:07:52 +0100
Thanks again...so this actually answers what i meant in my question....the sequence number is unique within the capture...so it´s like my identifier...

On 12/04/2008, Fabiana moreno <fvmoreno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh sorry im tired at the moment...im trying to calculate the packet loss!!!!!

On 12/04/2008, Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fabiana moreno wrote:
> im trying to calculate the end to end delay....


What are the "ends" in "end to end"?  Do you mean the delay between the
time at which the packet is sent from the host that's sending it to the
time at which the packet is received by the host that's receiving it?

If so, that's what the RTP sequence number is used for.


> if i have the id i can
> determine what packet is missing


If you have the RTP sequence number, you can determine what packets
aren't in the capture (which could just mean that they weren't captured;
it doesn't necessarily mean they weren't sent or weren't received) - to
quote RFC 1889:


        sequence number: 16 bits
             The sequence number increments by one for each RTP data packet
sent, *and may be used by the receiver to detect packet loss* and to
restore packet sequence. The initial value of the sequence number is
random (unpredictable) to make known-plaintext attacks on encryption
more difficult, even if the source itself does not encrypt, because the
packets may flow through a translator that does. Techniques for choosing
unpredictable numbers are discussed in [7].

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users