Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Decoding packets from a Cisco's "ip traffic-export" flow

From: Sake Blok <sake@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 15:21:17 +0100
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 03:58:31PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I used bittwiste to remove the first 12 bytes of the attached packet capture
> that included a variety of traffic, and you'll see that some packets are
> fine, but others, such as 4, 7, 8, etc are not.
> 
> Can anyone make sense of it?

As in my other mail, I don't think the first 12 bytes are incorrect.
These are the expected src and dst mac when using "ip traffic-export".
Frame 1, 2 and 3 in this capture file show the exact behavior of
the capture you sent in earlier.

However, frame 4, 7 and 8 show a different, but similar behavior:

First the dst-mac, ie the mac which is configured in the "ip export-traffic"
profile:

00 12 79 63 1a 8c

Then the mac-addres of the egress cisco interface towards the wireshark-PC:

00 30 b6 53 00 06

Then again the Ethertype for IP:

08 00

Now things get funny, these three bytes look like the last three bytes
of the PPPoE header, where is the rest???:

0a 00 36

Again the PP header:

00 21

And the IP-header plus data:

45 00 00 34 0d d7 40 00 7f 06 71 4f ac
10 00 0f 62 d8 6d a6 c8 b2 01 bb 46 31 f7 17 00
00 00 00 80 02 20 00 ca cf 00 00 02 04 05 a0 01
03 03 08 01 01 04 02

Could it be that there were two different source interfaces which 
were "ip export-traffic" forwarded? Maybe even of a different 
interface type?

For these frames, deleting the 5 bytes between the Ethertype IP (08 00) 
and the IP layer (starting with 45 00) will result in valid frames.

In the other frames, deleting 12 bytes between the src-mac and the 
PPPoE session ethertype (88 64) makes them valid frames.

Hmmm... if you want all frames to be persistent with each other and
with the normal output of "ip traffic-export", deleting the 5 or 20 
bytes between the IP Ethertype (08 00) and the start of the IP header
(45 00) would do the trick. Unfortunately I don't think bittwiste
will support that though :(

Cheers,
    Sake