Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] strange artefact of ethereal for SCTP packets or something

From: Jehanzeb Khan <jehanzeb.khan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Hello Ariel
 In case you decide not to send it to the list, can you send it to me as well?
 
Regards
Jehanzeb Khan

----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 2:00:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] strange artefact of ethereal for SCTP packets or something else

Hi Ariel,

can you provide a small example tracefile (in pcap format)?
If you do not want to send it to the list, you can send
it directly to me.

Best regards
Michael

On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:09 PM, Ariel Burbaickij wrote:
> Hello all,
> in some fairly common implementation of M3UA/SCTP of one of the major
> Scandinavian
> vendor I see in ethereal something strange:
> Several SCTP packets (packets as oposed to chunks, i.e. with two
> separate SCTP headers)
> are bundled over the same one IP packet. Question: is it some
> massaging of packets
> happening in ethereal or is it, indeed, possible option, should later
> be the case can
> you point me to the spec that describes it. To make clear: I do not
> speak about chunk
> bundling here  but something that looks like packet bundling, indeed.
>
> /wbr
> Ariel Burbaickij
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users



Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.