Oh, I am very sorry. Before version 0.99.5 was used.
/wbr
Ariel Burbaickij
On Jan 15, 2008 11:57 AM, Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> Well what version vere you using before? Binary H.248 is relativly new and undervent drastic changes
> in the lst year or so...
>
> Regards
> Anders
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ariel Burbaickij
> Sent: den 15 januari 2008 11:38
> To: Community support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP
>
> Hello Andreas, Hello all,
> actually we upgraded to 0.99.7 and wireshark decodes the very same stream nicely.
> So much for positive experience ;-).
> However, the question is, without going to repository, where there any changes that could have caused such a drastic change?
>
> /wbr
> Ariel Burbaickij
>
> On Jan 15, 2008 7:12 AM, Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > No both *should* work...
> > Regards
> > Anders
> >
> > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > Från: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Ariel Burbaickij
> > Skickat: den 15 januari 2008 00:39
> > Till: Community support list for Wireshark
> > Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP
> >
> >
> > Hello Anders,
> > it is actually binary not text. Would it matter for wireshark?
> >
> > /wbr
> > Ariel Burbaickij
> > On 1/12/08, Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Traces I have of H.248 over SCTP decodes...
> > > Is PPID 7 used? Is it Binary or text?
> > > Can you send a small sample trace?
> > > Regards
> > > Anders
> > >
> > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > > Från: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Ariel Burbaickij
> > > Skickat: den 12 januari 2008 11:02
> > > Till: wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Ämne: [Wireshark-users] h.248 over SCTP
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > > we use h.248 over SCTP and wireshark behaves in such a way that I at
> > > least need your advise as of now I still hesistate to submit bug report.
> > > We observe following:
> > > 1) It is not possible to filter on h248 or MEGACO filters user needs
> > > to enter sctp protocol payload
> > > number in order to get the packets of interest.
> > > 2) h.248 content is not being decoded properly, also after applying
> > > "decode as..." functionality
> > >
> > > 3) it is not possible to select H.248/MEGACO if decode should be
> > > based on port and not on PPID
> > >
> > > Question: Is all this known bugs/behaviour, do I do something wrong
> > > while working with it or should I submit bug report?
> > >
> > >
> > > /wbr
> > > Ariel Burbaickij
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>