> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Harris
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 11:23 AM
>
> Mark G. wrote:
>
> > But for those of us who are using Wireshark to leech large
> > numbers of images from a commercial web site, the incremental
> > naming feature would be very helpful. ;-)
>
> Isn't that what programs such as curl and wget are for? Using Wireshark
> seems a bit indirect, especially given that somebody has to be fetching
> the file *anyway* in order for Wireshark to see the traffic.
If I could construct the URLs to obtain the images, then I would
certainly use a different tool to fetch the data. But I can't.
I need to interact with the web site to fetch the images.
The web site uses a proprietary viewer which does not appear to
cache the images after they are downloaded. So I am using Wireshark
extract the images from the data stream.
-Mark