why? is you have excuse for that?
regards
-radja
Lars Ruoff <lars.ruoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, the delay is not taken into account for the maximum if the packet has the Marker bit set.
br,
Lars Ruoff
raja satria utama wrote:
> in windows "Wireshark:RTP Sream Analysis" shows Delta for each packet,
> you can see figure on my attached file...
> on windows was written "max delta is 2.698175 second at packet no.849"
> but if we look at the end of column in RTP stream analysis the maxest
> delta is 4929.78 at packet 1307
> i wanna ask why in determining of max delta is different..??? it's
> caused by the marker value ?
>
> */Gerry Brown /* wrote:
>
> >what does mean column of
'Marker" in windows "Wireshark:RTP Stream
> >Analysis"??
>
> From RFC 3550
> marker (M): 1 bit
> The interpretation of the marker is defined by a profile. It is
> intended to allow significant events such as frame boundaries to
> be marked in the packet stream. A profile MAY define additional
> marker bits or specify that there is no marker bit by changing the
> number of bits in the payload type field (see Section 5.3).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out
new cars at Yahoo! Autos.