[Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Guy Harris wrote:

> I have no interest in breaking the radiotap dissector by making it 
> assume no padding.  If there's a *reliable* mechanism for detecting 
> RouterOS's broken radiotap header, I'd be willing to accept a patch from 
> somebody for that, but I don't want to lose any ability to read correct 
> radiotap files.

Another possibility would be a libpcap-based program to read a RouterOS 
capture and write out a valid radiotap capture, adding the padding to 
the RouterOS radiotap header.