Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] This log doesn't seem right (newbie question)
From: "ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:13:55 +1000
It looks like you capture all outgoing packets twice some 30us apart.
Is this captured on windows hosts? do you use something like BlackIce on that windows host?
There is some interaction between tools such as BlackIce and the capture process on windows that sometimes lead to the outgoing packets being captured twice in exactly this manner.
Is this captured on windows hosts? do you use something like BlackIce on that windows host?
There is some interaction between tools such as BlackIce and the capture process on windows that sometimes lead to the outgoing packets being captured twice in exactly this manner.
On 9/28/06, Sean Baker <sbaker48@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am new to using Ethereal/Wireshark, and I am trying to evaluate a TFTP transfer that is taking place over a mesh connection. I have a capture from each side of the transfer, and I have pasted the first few blocks from each below.
I am trying to figure out, is there something wrong in the transfer, or in my capture, or is nothing wrong at all and this somehow makes sense. I used Ethereal 0.99.0 to take the capture (I only just now figured out the name change)
On the sending machine:
10 0.020317 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Write Request, File: test.dat, Transfer type: octet
11 0.020343 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Write Request, File: test.dat, Transfer type: octet
13 0.035808 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 0
14 0.043239 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 1
15 0.043337 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 1
16 0.054922 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 1
17 0.074384 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 2
18 0.074478 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 2
19 0.086024 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 2
20 0.131180 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 3
21 0.131295 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 3
22 0.142934 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 3
23 0.152583 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 4
24 0.152693 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 4
25 0.164278 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 4
...
Summary:
Bytes: 3282764
Avg. bytes/sec: 67510.174
Avg. MBit/sec: 0.540
========
On the receiving machine:
11 7.662706 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Write Request, File: test.dat , Transfer type: octet
12 7.664711 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 0
13 7.664737 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 0
14 7.684252 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 1
15 7.684324 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 1
16 7.684335 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 1
17 7.715359 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 2
18 7.715415 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 2
19 7.715426 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 2
20 7.772210 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 3
21 7.772330 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 3
22 7.772347 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 3
23 7.793593 10.161.132.1 10.162.85.1 TFTP Data Packet, Block: 4
24 7.793682 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 4
25 7.793698 10.162.85.1 10.161.132.1 TFTP Acknowledgement, Block: 4
...
Summary:
Bytes: 1745089
Avg. bytes/sec: 35897.661
Avg. MBit/sec: 0.287
Thanks for any advice,
--Sean
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] This log doesn't seem right (newbie question)
- From: Sean Baker
- [Wireshark-users] This log doesn't seem right (newbie question)
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-users] This log doesn't seem right (newbie question)
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] This log doesn't seem right (newbie question)
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-users] This log doesn't seem right (newbie question)
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] This log doesn't seem right (newbie question)
- Index(es):