> Well, to quote Ulf Lamping's reply to your previous message
> (you *are* subscribed to the wireshark-users list, so that
> you'll see replies, right?):
I didn't got any replies other then this and the one from
Ronnie Sahlberg. It seems, now I'm correctly subscribed.
> > Is it only the ICMP packets or other packets as well that
> you don't see?
> >
> > Make sure you that you can capture both directions of the
> > conversation, as it could be a capture interface problem.
>
> I.e., one possibility is that whatever hardware and software
> you're using to capture the traffic is seeing only one side
> of the traffic.
> Are you seeing any other non-broadcast, non-multicast traffic
> sent to the controller?
I'm sure all traffic in network was captured, just tested it with
a ping request and got both answers and replies. Also with pings
from second to third.
> If you are, another possibility is that the echo request, for
> some reason, wasn't captured by whatever was capturing the
> traffic you saw - for example, it might have been dropped
> because too much traffic was arriving for whatever software
> was capturing it to store it.
How much traffic should a regular PC (2 GHz, 1024 MB Ram,
10 Mbit Network Adapter) able to handle?
> Another possibility, as Ronnie Sahlberg noted, is that
> there's a bug in the protocol stack; there is no TCP packet
> that would request an echo reply - there's no packet other
> than an ICMP echo request that is supposed to cause an echo
> reply to be sent.
That's was I worried about.
Best Regards
Michael Steinecke