Hi community,
I have a question related to the nr-rrc protocol channelBWs scs-30kHz field name.
As an example, in a UE Capability Information message for NR bands we have channel BWs DL/UL fr1 like this:
channelBWs-DL: fr1 (0)
fr1
scs-15kHz: 0000 [bit length 10, 6 LSB pad bits, 0000 0000 00.. .... decimal value 0]
scs-30kHz: 77c0 [bit length 10, 6 LSB pad bits, 0111 0111 11.. .... decimal value 479]
scs-60kHz: 0000 [bit length 10, 6 LSB pad bits, 0000 0000 00.. .... decimal value 0]
The respective field names are:
nr-rrc.bandNR.channelBWs_DL.fr1.scs_15kHz
nr-rrc.scs_30kHz <---- why?
nr-rrc.bandNR.channelBWs_DL.fr1.scs_60kHz
These related to the asn1 .cnf file settings (30kHz is missing):
#.FIELD_RENAME
BandNR/channelBWs-DL/fr1/scs-15kHz bandNR_channelBWs-DL_fr1_scs-15kHz
BandNR/channelBWs-UL/fr1/scs-15kHz bandNR_channelBWs-UL_fr1_scs-15kHz
BandNR/channelBWs-DL/fr1/scs-60kHz bandNR_channelBWs-DL_fr1_scs-60kHz
BandNR/channelBWs-UL/fr1/scs-60kHz bandNR_channelBWs-UL_fr1_scs-60kHz
#.FIELD_ATTR
BandNR/channelBWs-DL/fr1/scs-15kHz ABBREV=bandNR.channelBWs_DL.fr1.scs_15kHz
BandNR/channelBWs-UL/fr1/scs-15kHz ABBREV=bandNR.channelBWs_UL.fr1.scs_15kHz
BandNR/channelBWs-DL/fr1/scs-60kHz ABBREV=bandNR.channelBWs_DL.fr1.scs_60kHz
BandNR/channelBWs-UL/fr1/scs-60kHz ABBREV=bandNR.channelBWs_UL.fr1.scs_60kHz
header fields in the .c file:
{ &hf_nr_rrc_bandNR_channelBWs_DL_fr1_scs_15kHz,
{ "scs-15kHz", "nr-rrc.bandNR.channelBWs_DL.fr1.scs_15kHz",
FT_BYTES, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,
"BIT_STRING_SIZE_10", HFILL }},
{ &hf_nr_rrc_scs_30kHz_09,
{ "scs-30kHz", "nr-rrc.scs_30kHz",
FT_BYTES, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,
"BIT_STRING_SIZE_10", HFILL }},
{ &hf_nr_rrc_bandNR_channelBWs_DL_fr1_scs_60kHz,
{ "scs-60kHz", "nr-rrc.bandNR.channelBWs_DL.fr1.scs_60kHz",
FT_BYTES, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,
"BIT_STRING_SIZE_10", HFILL }},
Is this deliberate or a minor bug?
Shouldn't there be the same logic for scs-30kHz too?
Thank you.
Regards,
Tamas