From: Pascal Quantin. Friday, June 28, 2024 17:21
> Actually what I wrote is the encoding I'm used to, and that
> does not match either the rules you defined.
> Did you mean:
> [0] MCC digit 2, MCC digit 1
> [1] MNC digit 3, MCC digit 3
> [2] MNC digit 2, MNC digit 1
> Instead of:
> [0] MCC digit 2, MCC digit 1
> [1] MNC digit 1, MCC digit 3
> [2] MNC digit 3, MNC digit 2
> ?
> I guess this is the case given the textual description you gave.
> I would prefer the former (the one following the encoding I gave
> as an example).
>
Ok, I think numbering the digits from 1-3 was confusing because
it made unclear which one is the most significant one.
Digit 1 is the most significant one, the first one when reading
the decimal number from left to right.
[0] MCC digit 2, MCC digit 1
[1] MNC digit 3, MCC digit 3
[2] MNC digit 2, MNC digit 1
Sorry for the confusion, Pascal: too many errors in my first email!
You are right, it is the standard BCD encoding from 3GPP.
I will continue working on my merge request.
Thanks,
Mauro