[Antonello Tartamo <antonellotartamo@xxxxxxxxx>]

The problem is that I don't have a predefined ether type as the ether type field is used as length field.

Is there any other way to reuse the ethernet dissector ?

Thanks in advance

Il giorno dom 23 mag 2021 alle ore 16:12 Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:

On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 5:06 AM Antonello Tartamo
<antonellotartamo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
> I'm trying to create an ethernet dissector for a custom protocol working on L2.
>
> In proto_reg_handoff_myproto() function I've called:
> heur_dissector_add("eth", dissect_myproto, "MyProtocol", "mp", proto_mp, HEURISTIC_ENABLE);
> eth_handle = find_dissector("eth_withoutfcs");
>
> then in the dissect_myproto function when I call:
> tvbuff_t* next_tvb = tvb_new_subset_remaining(tvb, 0);
> int new_off = call_dissector(eth_handle, tvb, pinfo, tree);
> return new_off;
>
> I get the following two errors on the terminal:
> ** (wireshark:11483): WARNING **: 07:31:59.826: Dissector bug, protocol Ethernet, in packet 12: /home/osboxes/Devel/wireshark/epan/packet.c:2794: failed assertion "saved_layers_len < 500"
>
> ** (wireshark:11483): WARNING **: 07:31:59.826: Dissector bug, protocol Ethernet, in packet 12: /home/osboxes/Devel/wireshark/epan/packet.c:775: failed assertion "saved_layers_len < 500"
>
> I'm running the development wireshark with ./run/wireshark.
>
> I think the error is due to the fact the both the heuristic dissector and the "find_dissector" are ethernet based.
> Is there another way to reuse the ethernet dissector and avoid manually adding to the tree the src/dst mac addresses and the ethertype ?

If you are using a fixed ethertype, then the ieee1905 dissector
(packet-ieee1905.c) does this:

void
proto_reg_handoff_ieee1905(void)
{
    static dissector_handle_t ieee1905_handle;

    ieee1905_handle = create_dissector_handle(dissect_ieee1905,
                proto_ieee1905);

    dissector_add_uint("ethertype", ETHERTYPE_IEEE_1905, ieee1905_handle);

    eapol_handle = find_dissector("eapol");
}

You can ignore the eapol_handle stuff unless you also plan to use
EAPOL (ieee801.X) in your protocol.

--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe