[Paul Offord <paul.offord58@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks All,  I decided to take the nuclear option as I realised I had set my repositories up incorrectly, I think because I started with the old doc ( https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SubmittingPatches ) rather than the new doc.  Things seem better now.

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:46 PM Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 5, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Maynard, Christopher via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of chuck c
>> Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 5:26 PM
>> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Struggling to rebase
>>
>> But sometimes I'm this guy:
>> https://twitter.com/catalinmpit/status/1301965170076459009
>
> Naturally, there's a relevant xkcd for this: https://xkcd.com/1597/

        https://twitter.com/spences10/status/1301973429206343686

Or, to quote Ellen Ripley:

        I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

--

Paul Offord