Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should "lts-" branches be Protected branches?

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Should "lts-" branches be Protected branches?

From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:19:20 -0700

On 10/4/20 11:46 AM, chuck c wrote:
> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&search=lts
> 
> History? - https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201404/msg00163.html
> 
> What are Protected branches? - https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/protected_branches.html

They're now protected.

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Should "lts-" branches be Protected branches?
  - From: chuck c

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug (Wireshark blocking VPN traffic)
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Possible bug (Wireshark blocking VPN traffic)
Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Should "lts-" branches be Protected branches?
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] nas_eps value type change request
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread