PFA wireshark file.
Thanks. The current MR gives the following decoding:
C-TAG :
IE Type: C-TAG (134)
IE Length: 3
Flags: 0x04, VID
0000 0... = Spare: 0
.... .1.. = VID: True
.... ..0. = DEI: False
.... ...0 = PCP: False
0000 .... 1100 1000 = C-VID: 0x00c8
.... 0... = Drop eligible indicator (DEI): Ineligible
.... .000 = Priority code point (PCP): Best Effort (default), Drop Eligible (0)
Best regards,
Pascal.
Regards
Ranjeet S
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 9:31 PM Pascal Quantin <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Ranjeet,
>
> Le sam. 12 sept. 2020 à 17:58, Ranjeet kumar singh <ranjeetsih@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Pascal
>>
>> Please find the attached image that shows the byte dump of the c-tag IE.
>
>
> Please provide a full packet if you want the bug to be fixed. Thanks for your understanding.
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Ranjeet Singh
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 9:08 PM Pascal Quantin <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Ranjeet,
>> >
>> > Le sam. 12 sept. 2020 à 10:16, Pascal Quantin <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>> >>
>> >> Le sam. 12 sept. 2020 à 04:40, Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sep 11, 2020, at 7:04 PM, Ranjeet kumar singh <ranjeetsih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > I am seeing following error
>> >>> >
>> >>> > [Dissector bug, protocol PFCP:
>> >>> > C:\buildbot\builders\wireshark-3.2-64\windows-2019-x64\build\epan\proto.c:11594:
>> >>> > field pfcp.c_tag.dei_flag is not of type FT_CHAR or an FT_{U}INTn
>> >>> > type]
>> >>> >
>> >>> > with a pfcp session establishment request.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Can someone please confirm if it is a bug.
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, Wireshark confirmed it, by saying "Dissector bug". That's what the "bug" in "Dissector bug" means.
>> >>>
>> >>> The right place to report Wireshark bugs is
>> >>>
>> >>> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> See https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/227
>> >>
>> >> I still have a doubt regarding the C-VID / S-VID encoding. See the MR comment for more details.
>> >
>> >
>> > it would be great if you could share a pcap containing a packet with a C-TAG or S-TAG IE so as to verify the fix.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Pascal.
>> > ___________________________________________________________________________
>> > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>> > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe