Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issues in synphasor dissector
From: John Thacker <johnthacker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 19:30:13 -0400
Well, there are two other options:
1) Adding the ability to do BASE_CUSTOM for FT_FLOAT and FT_DOUBLE
2) Declaring as FT_[U]INT32 with BASE_CUSTOM, and do the type punning in the custom function, as done in
tvb_get_nttohieee_float() in tvbuff.c for when FT_FLOAT is used anyway. For bonus points, implement (or export
and make no longer static) get_ieee_float() in the same that exists for VAXen and other non IEEE754 floating point
machines where simple type punning won't work.
John Thacker
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:51 PM Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
___________________________________________________________________________Hi,
So, you want to keep this function call:
proto_tree_add_item(wgs84_tree, hf_conf_pmu_lat, tvb, offset, 4, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
with this header field definition:
{ &hf_conf_pmu_lat, { "PMU Latitude", "synphasor.conf.pmu_latitude", FT_FLOAT,
BASE_NONE | BASE_UNIT_STRING, &units_degree_degrees, 0x0, NULL, HFILL }}
but have it output "Unspecified Location" in case the value is +/- infinity.
Unfortunately the use of BASE_CUSTOM is not available for FT_FLOAT, so I see no other way than this:
if (isinf(pmu_lat)) {
proto_tree_add_float_format_value(wgs84_tree, hf_conf_pmu_lat_unknown, tvb, offset, 4, INFINITY, unspecified_location);
} else {
proto_tree_add_item(wgs84_tree, hf_conf_pmu_lat, tvb, offset, 4, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
}
and these header field definitions:
{ &hf_conf_pmu_lat_unknown, { "PMU Latitude", "synphasor.conf.pmu_latitude", FT_FLOAT,
BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0, NULL, HFILL }}{ &hf_conf_pmu_lat, { "PMU Latitude", "synphasor.conf.pmu_latitude", FT_FLOAT,
BASE_NONE | BASE_UNIT_STRING, &units_degree_degrees, 0x0, NULL, HFILL }}
Now at least the field abbrev "synphasor.conf.pmu_latitude" has a constant type FT_FLOAT.
I hope I got this right.Jaap
On 7/6/20 10:12 PM, Елисеев Дмитрий Алексеевич wrote:
Hello, Jaap Keuter!
I made some fast cheks and need some help.I need some function like:
proto_tree_add_item(wgs84_tree, hf_conf_pmu_lat, tvb, offset, 4, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
{ &hf_conf_pmu_lat, { "PMU Latitude", "synphasor.conf.pmu_latitude", FT_FLOAT,
BASE_NONE | BASE_UNIT_STRING, &units_degree_degrees, 0x0, NULL, HFILL }}witch replace Infinity with text: "Unspecified Location"
С уважением,
Дмитрий Елисеев инженер сектора испытаний систем управления и автоматики АО «НТЦ ЕЭС» т: 29-29-499 доб. 214 a: ул. Курчатова, д. 1, лит.А , Санкт-Петербург, Россия, 194223 e: eliseev@xxxxxxxxx
От: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Кому: Dmitriy Eliseev <eliseev_d@xxxxxxxxx>, Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Отправлено: 06.07.2020 19:10
Тема: Issues in synphasor dissector
Hi Dmitriy,
There are still some issues with the synphasor dissector. There are a number of fields with the same field abbreviation, but incompatible type.
These are lines from the 'conflict check' run by the buildbot:
'synphasor.conf.chnam_len' exists multiple times with NOT compatible types: FT_STRING and FT_UINT8
'synphasor.conf.phasor_flags' exists multiple times with NOT compatible types: FT_UINT16 and FT_BOOLEAN
'synphasor.conf.pmu_latitude' exists multiple times with NOT compatible types: FT_STRING and FT_FLOAT
'synphasor.conf.pmu_longitude' exists multiple times with NOT compatible types: FT_STRING and FT_FLOAT
'synphasor.conf.pmu_elevation' exists multiple times with NOT compatible types: FT_STRING and FT_FLOAT
https://buildbot.wireshark.org/petri-dish/builders/Ubuntu%20Petri%20Dish%20x64/builds/12010/steps/conflict%20check/logs/stdio
You seem to be knowledgeable about this protocol and dissector. Would you be able to address these reported issues?
Thanks,
Jaap
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issues in synphasor dissector
- From: Jaap Keuter
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issues in synphasor dissector
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issues in synphasor dissector
- From: Jaap Keuter
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issues in synphasor dissector
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issues in synphasor dissector
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issues in synphasor dissector
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issues in synphasor dissector
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Issues in synphasor dissector
- Index(es):