On Jan 28, 2020, at 2:24 AM, Graham Bloice <graham.bloice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As noted somewhere in the linked discussion, I suspect that the end result will be projects caching a "suitable" version for a while and then periodically, e.g. major releases, updating to the current latest. It's too much work to track latest with the potential for introducing new bugs. In summary this will have the opposite effect to that which Qt expects.
The FOSS community interprets annoying licensing terms as damage and routes around them?