[Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jaap

I was in contact with the original developer of QCustomPlot. According to his statement, this warning is a false-positive, as it cannot occur with real numbers.

FYI, he will create a version 2.0.2 or 2.2.x depending on the changes, sometime by the end of this year, beginning of next. We will upgrade to this version, as soon as it is available, as it will also allow us to get rid of our own internal modifications for the warnings.

kind regards

Roland

Am Fr., 20. Sept. 2019 um 14:13 Uhr schrieb Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>:

Hi Alexis, Roland, 

I assume you are aware of these:

Begin forwarded message:

From: scan-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for Wireshark

Date: 20 September 2019 at 07:46:10 CEST

...

** CID 1453859:    (DIVIDE_BY_ZERO)


________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*** CID 1453859:    (DIVIDE_BY_ZERO)
/home/wireshark/builders/wireshark-master-fuzz/clangcodeanalysis/build/ui/qt/widgets/qcustomplot.cpp: 20769 in QCPGraph::dataToImpulseLines(const QVector<QCPGraphData> &) const()
20763       // transform data points to pixels:
20764       if (keyAxis->orientation() == Qt::Vertical)
20765       {
20766         for (int i=0; i<data.size(); ++i)
20767         {
20768           const double key = keyAxis->coordToPixel(data.at(i).key);

   CID 1453859:    (DIVIDE_BY_ZERO)
   In function call "coordToPixel", division by _expression_ "0." has undefined behavior.

20769           result[i*2+0].setX(valueAxis->coordToPixel(0));
20770           result[i*2+0].setY(key);
20771           result[i*2+1].setX(valueAxis->coordToPixel(data.at(i).value));
20772           result[i*2+1].setY(key);
20773         }
20774       } else // key axis is horizontal
/home/wireshark/builders/wireshark-master-fuzz/clangcodeanalysis/build/ui/qt/widgets/qcustomplot.cpp: 20780 in QCPGraph::dataToImpulseLines(const QVector<QCPGraphData> &) const()
20774       } else // key axis is horizontal
20775       {
20776         for (int i=0; i<data.size(); ++i)
20777         {
20778           const double key = keyAxis->coordToPixel(data.at(i).key);
20779           result[i*2+0].setX(key);

   CID 1453859:    (DIVIDE_BY_ZERO)
   In function call "coordToPixel", division by _expression_ "0." has undefined behavior.

20780           result[i*2+0].setY(valueAxis->coordToPixel(0));
20781           result[i*2+1].setX(key);
20782           result[i*2+1].setY(valueAxis->coordToPixel(data.at(i).value));
20783         }
20784       }
20785       return result;

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe