Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector?

From: Antoine d'Otreppe <a.dotreppe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 08:52:39 +0000
Hi Peter, hi Anders,

Thanks for the pointers! I'll look into it and report back here when I have more information on the topic.


Cheers,
Antoine




‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, November 9, 2018 9:32 AM, Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: Wireshark-dev wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On Behalf Of Peter
> > Wu
> > Sent: den 9 november 2018 00:22
> > To: Antoine d'Otreppe a.dotreppe@xxxxxxxxxx; Developer support list for
> > Wireshark wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Anyone working on a Syncthing dissector?
> > Hi Antoine!
> > Based on the specifications for Syncthing, it appears that it uses Protobuf
> > for defining its messages:
> > https://docs.syncthing.net/specs/
> > I am not sure how well protobuf is currently supported on Wireshark, you
> > could scan the issue tracker and code review site to see if there is any
> > current work in that area.
> > Kind regards,
> > Peter
> > https://lekensteyn.nl
> > (pardon my brevity, top-posting and formatting, sent from my phone)
>
> Hi,
> I think these pending commits are relevant:
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/22892/
> https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/23988/
>
> Regards
> Anders
>
> On November 8, 2018 9:32:50 PM GMT+01:00, Antoine d'Otreppe
> a.dotreppe@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> > I'm interested in learning more about wireshark in general, and in
> > particular learning how to make my own dissectors.
> > I just happened to find a protocol that doesn't seem to have any
> > dissector for it yet: syncthing. https://syncthing.net/ The local
> > discovery protocol looks easy enough to begin with, as it is only UDP
> > broadcasts.
> > Your developer guide recommends to send a mail before starting
> > development to check if anyone else would be working on a similar
> > topic. That sounds reasonable :)
> > Anybody working on that protocol yet?
> > Regards,
> > Antoine d'Otreppe
>
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe