[Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Thinking about it a bit more should proto_registrar_get_id_byname() assert on a non valid name? This may be the simplest safe guard.

Regards

Anders

 

From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Anders Broman
Sent: den 18 september 2018 10:29
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception

 

Hi,

Perhaps filter names referenced in other dissectors should be a define in a common .h file to make it obvious that the name must be changed in more than one place. Solving part of the problem.

Then TRANSNUM should check for -1 I suppose and perhaps my trouble shooting patch:

        if (hf_of_interest[i].hf < 0) {

            g_warning("hf %s not found, index %u", hf_of_interest[i].proto_name);

        }

Regards

Anders

 

 

From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Pascal Quantin
Sent: den 18 september 2018 10:23
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception

 

I'm uploading a patch.

 

Pascal.

 

Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 10:20, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Hi Anders,

 

Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 10:19, Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Hi,
I think that the problem is that one of these fields has changed name, but debugging the registration phase is hard on Windows as the console is not open...GRR

 

this seems to be the ssl.record.content_type field.

We should check if we can make Transum more robust to this kind of errors in the future.

 

 

* The following are the field ids for the protocol values used by TRANSUM.
    Make sure they line up with ehf_of_interest order */
HF_OF_INTEREST_INFO hf_of_interest[HF_INTEREST_END_OF_LIST] = {
    { -1, "ip.proto" },
    { -1, "ipv6.nxt" },

    { -1, "tcp.analysis.retransmission" },
    { -1, "tcp.analysis.keep_alive" },
    { -1, "tcp.flags.syn" },
    { -1, "tcp.flags.ack" },
    { -1, "tcp.flags.reset" },
    { -1, "tcp.flags.urg" },
    { -1, "tcp.seq" },
    { -1, "tcp.srcport" },
    { -1, "tcp.dstport" },
    { -1, "tcp.stream" },
    { -1, "tcp.len" },

    { -1, "udp.srcport" },
    { -1, "udp.dstport" },
    { -1, "udp.stream" },
    { -1, "udp.length" },

    { -1, "ssl.record.content_type" },

    { -1, "tds.type" },
    { -1, "tds.length" },

    { -1, "smb.mid" },

    { -1, "smb2.sesid" },
    { -1, "smb2.msg_id" },
    { -1, "smb2.cmd" },

    { -1, "dcerpc.ver" },
    { -1, "dcerpc.pkt_type" },
    { -1, "dcerpc.cn_call_id" },
    { -1, "dcerpc.cn_ctx_id" },

    { -1, "dns.id"},
};
Regards
Anders

-----Original Message-----
From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of João Valverde
Sent: den 18 september 2018 10:10
To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception



On 18/09/18 01:07, Maynard, Chris wrote:
> Thanks for the tips Richard, but after some additional testing and some head-scratching, I discovered the source of the problem was something in my profile, because if I switched to a pristine profile, then master ran fine.  Through divide-and-conquer/trial-and-error, I discovered that it was due to enabling the transum dissector, although I can't figure out why enabling the transum dissector causes this, and then only for master.  Enabling it for 2.6.2 seems fine.
>
> Maybe someone could just confirm if they also experience this exception if they enable the transum dissector?  If confirmed, I will file a bug report.

Confirmed on the latest master. Enabling transum crashes wireshark.

> The exception, for reference:
>
> Unhandled exception ("proto.c:6497: failed assertion "(guint)hfid < gpa_hfinfo.len" (Unregistered hf!)", group=1, code=6)
>
> Thanks.
> - Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 4:22 PM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception
>
> <snip>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International Game Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary, confidential or trade secret information.  This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>               mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe