Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fields offsets & tree hierarchy questions
From: "Sultan, Hassan" <sultah@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:09:40 +0000
Nevermind the last question, that was me being dumb and fooled by the offset. They actually are under the http tree > -----Original Message----- > From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > Of Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 10:03 AM > To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Sultan, Hassan <sultah@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Fields offsets & tree hierarchy questions > > Hi everyone, > > Sorry to bother you with might be beginner questions but... well... I'm a beginner > :) > > In my quest to understand how Wireshark's parsing engine works I've written a > small wrapper that iterates through all parsed fields and displays them in the > following format : > > [offset] [abbrev]([length]) : [value, which might be either my interpretation of > the bytes on the wire according to type/encoding info for the types I currently > support, or the ft_value of the field if it is present] > > And for some packets I am getting : > > 66 http(319) : > 66 text(17) : 485454502F312E3120323030204F4B0D0A > 66 http.request.version(8) : HTTP/1.1 > 75 http.response.code(3) : 200 > 79 http.response.phrase(2) : OK > 83 http.response.line(44) : Access-Control-Allow-Headers: content-type > > 127 http.response.line(32) : Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * > > 159 http.content_encoding(24) : gzip > 183 http.content_type(32) : application/json > 215 http.date(37) : Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:07:22 GMT > 252 http.server(19) : openresty > 271 http.response.line(23) : Vary: Accept-Encoding > > 294 http.response.line(16) : X-Cache-Hit: 0 > > 310 http.response.line(29) : X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN > > 339 http.content_length_header(20) : 83 > 359 http.connection(24) : keep-alive > 383 text(2) : 0D0A > 385 text(83) : > 1F8B080000000000000305C1C10E80200800D07FE11C5B5349F2671A226E5D25 > 4EAD7FEFBD17C26D5DF7800647B72A3A0B4AE689599490B9EE483258E5A4222 > 9C1061EAAE60EED5961DF0FC6434ECF41000000 > 0 http.file_data(65) : {"user_id":"6be7acf4-a38f-3ac5-8870- > 5ad8ca954a22","success":true} > 0 json(65) : > 0 json.object(65) : > 0E1827559C340E664E8DFFAE0800450001C6999B4000EA06847F364D8BBFAC1F > 02EB0050D864F3E601114594EC358018007DEF2500000101080A46DA716F0405 > 41 > 1 json.member(48) : > 1827559C340E664E8DFFAE0800450001C6999B4000EA06847F364D8BBFAC1F02 > EB0050D864F3E601114594EC35801800 > 11 json.value.string(38) : 6be7acf4-a38f-3ac5-8870-5ad8ca954a22 > 1 json.key(9) : user_id > 50 json.member(14) : EF2500000101080A46DA716F0405 > 60 json.value.true(4) : 716F0405 > 50 json.key(9) : success > > Which brings the following questions : > > 1) Am I right to assume there are absolutely no guarantee about the order of > fields reported by proto_tree_children_foreach in regard to offset within the > same tvb ? I'm looking at the json fields and the offsets of sub-fields are not > ordered. I guess the order is the order in which the fields were added to the tree > ? > 2) When looking at http.file_data(65), the field's offset is 0, relative to that > field's tvb which contains the decompressed data, is there any way to get the > position relative to the 'main' tvb representing the whole packet ? I couldn't find > one but maybe I'm missing something. http.file_data(65) represents > decompressed data so technically not present in the main tvb, but I was > wondering if there was a way to link it to the compressed data field it represents > (the "text(83)" field) > 3) I'm curious to know why the "text(83)" field and "json.object(65)" fields are > not under the http tree, that's where I would have expected them to be > > Thanks for your help, > > Hassan > _________________________________________________________________ > __________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Fields offsets & tree hierarchy questions
- From: Sultan, Hassan
- [Wireshark-dev] Fields offsets & tree hierarchy questions
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Fields offsets & tree hierarchy questions
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fields offsets & tree hierarchy questions
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Fields offsets & tree hierarchy questions
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fields offsets & tree hierarchy questions
- Index(es):