Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:58:47 -0700
This is now the "check for leftover processes" step on the Windows builders. On 4/11/17 2:03 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > For reference, the PowerShell equivalent, note that this will only attempt > to stop a pid once, there may be multiple locking handles for a single pid: > > # Stop-ProcessByFileLock > # Stops processes that have an open handle on the path fragment specified > > param( > [parameter(Mandatory=$true)] > [string]$path > ) > > $processes = @{} > $handles = handle $path > foreach($line in $handles) { > if ($line -match "(\S+)\s+pid: (\d*)") { > $processes[$($Matches[1])] = $($Matches[2]) > } > } > > foreach($process in $processes.GetEnumerator()) { > Write-Host "Killing process $($process.Name) with > pid:$($process.Value)" > Stop-Process -Id $process.Value -Force > } > > > > > On 10 April 2017 at 21:36, Maynard, Chris <Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxx > <mailto:Christopher.Maynard@xxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Here's a batch file that *might* also help? It makes use of both > handle.exe and taskkill.exe to /hopefully/ achieve what you're looking for? > > :: Forcefully kills the process with the given open file containing the > :: specified pattern. For example, running the following will kill the > first > :: process found with a file open that contains the string > "wireshark_pcapng" > :: anywhere in the name: > :: > :: killprocbyfile.bat wireshark_pcapng > :: > > @ECHO OFF > > IF ["%~1"] == [""] GOTO USAGE > > @ECHO OFF > FOR /F "TOKENS=1-3 USEBACKQ" %%I IN (`HANDLE.EXE "%1"`) DO ( > IF "%%J" == "pid:" ( > ECHO Killing %%I PID: %%K > TASKKILL.EXE /F /PID %%K > GOTO :EOF > ) > ) > GOTO :EOF > > :USAGE > ECHO Usage: %~0 ^<pattern^> > > - Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:wireshark-dev- > <mailto:wireshark-dev-> > > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of > Maynard, Chris > > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 2:12 PM > > To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down? > > > > Would taskkill.exe help? > > > > For example, "taskkill.exe /im dumpcap.exe" , etc. > > > > I've also used WMIC in the past to save ProcessID's of tasks so you can later kill > > specific instances of a task instead of all of them with the same name. I'd refer > > you to the dumpcap.bat file posted on https://wiki.wireshark.org/Tools <https://wiki.wireshark.org/Tools> for how > > I did that. > > > > - Chris > > [1]: > > https://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddoc <https://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/taskkill.mspx?mfr=true> > > s/en-us/taskkill.mspx?mfr=true > > > > - Chris > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:wireshark-dev- > <mailto:wireshark-dev-> > > > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of > Gerald Combs > > > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 2:06 PM > > > To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down? > > > > > > On 4/9/17 1:23 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9 April 2017 at 01:54, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > <mailto:gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 4/8/17 10:47 AM, Peter Wu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There is another problem though with the Petri-Dish builder, a previous > > > > > build on the Petri-Dish Windows x86 builder failed and left a process on > > > > > the machine, breaking all following builds. Gerald, can you have a look? > > > > > > > > It's back up. > > > > > > > > > Maybe it is an idea to add a pass that kills all > > > > > dumpcap/tshark/wireshark processes before starting the build? > > > (Assuming > > > > > that no other builds happen in parallel). > > > > > > > > Is there a straightforward equivalent to "kill -9 $( lsof -t > > > > /path/to/buildbot )" on Windows? > > > > > > > > > > > > Difficult to identify which process you want to kill with > > > > Stop-Process. With PS 4.0 and later you can run ((Get-Process > > > > -IncludeUserName).where({$_.username -AND $_.username -notmatch > > > > "^NT"})) to get the processes owned by the user account running the > > > > command, but there's still too many in there that shouldn't be stopped. > > > > > > > > Maybe Get-Process | Where-Object -Property ProcessName -match > > > > ".*(Process1|Process2|Process3).*" | Stop-Process would do if the > > > > number of processes to look for isn't too bad. > > > > > > How difficult would it be to parse the output of the Sysinternals > > > "Handle" utility in PS? That would presumably tell us which process > > > has the build directory locked while limiting the risk of clobbering > > > any other Buildbot instances that happen to be running. > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > > ___________ > > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev> > > > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > <https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev> > > > > > > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > <mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International Game > > Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary, > > confidential or trade secret information. This message is intended solely for > > the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient and have > > received this message in error, please delete this message from your system. > > Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or > > its attachments is strictly prohibited. > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > ___________ > > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev> > > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > <https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev> > > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > <mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International > Game Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain > proprietary, confidential or trade secret information. This message is > intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the > intended recipient and have received this message in error, please > delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized reading, > distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments > is strictly prohibited. > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > <https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev> > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > <https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev> > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > -- > Graham Bloice > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >
- References:
- [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- From: Simon Barber
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- From: Peter Wu
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- From: Gerald Combs
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- From: Graham Bloice
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- From: Gerald Combs
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- From: Maynard, Chris
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- From: Maynard, Chris
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- From: Graham Bloice
- [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] epan_t and capture_file
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] epan_t and capture_file
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] buildbot down?
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] Inconsistent availability of proto_tree values during the first of two passes
- Index(es):