Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Conditional compiles

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:48:45 -0800
On Feb 13, 2017, at 4:53 PM, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> To me it looks like HAVE_LIBPCAP would be a candidate to solve somehow, as it is
> regularly involved when compiles break without this define. Would it maybe make sense
> so include a dummy version inside Wireshark that basically does (mostly) nothing?

To what extent is it important that it be possible to build a version of Wireshark without packet capture capabilities?