Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Enabling/disabling post dissectors

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 14:19:08 -0800
On Dec 24, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We have 4 post-dissectors in the current source (mate, transom, snort, prp) and only mate defaults to being enabled (based on quick grep of API calls, it may be smart enough to be "disabled" if there is no configuration).

Presumably meaning "the user won't have to enable MATE manually if they've configured it - it'll automatically enable itself if configured and disable itself if not configured".