Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Changes to internal Lua classes implementation (Pinfo, TvbRa
From: Peter Wu <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 01:18:33 +0200
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 10:39:08AM +0100, Graham Bloice wrote: > On 3 October 2016 at 00:51, Peter Wu <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > To fix bug 12968 (__gc being called for tables, resulting in lua_error > > while exiting), I modified the way how classes are registered in > > https://code.wireshark.org/review/18026 > > > > In these changes I also reduced the use of macros, following Jo�os > > concerns. Macros like WSLUA_META should most likely become typedefs. > > Below I will give a motivation for the changes (feedback welcome!). > > > > > > Consider class Address with function Address.ip and metamethods like > > address.__tostring. Previously you could have these strange invocations: > > > > -- note: "Address" is the global class, "address" is an instance. > > tostring(Address) -- invokes metamethod __tostring (error!) > > address.ip("foo") -- invokes "static" class function > > tostring(FileHandler) -- error > > filehandler.new(...) -- huh? > > > > In the proposed change, there will be different method tables and > > metatables for the class ("Address") and its instances ("address"). > > Further modification could disable the above badness, allowing just: > > > > tostring(address) > > Address.ip("foo") > > tostring(filehandler) > > FileHandler.new(...) > > > > This might break some dissectors that use non-documented invocations, > > but enables use of separate __call functions for example: > > > > field = Field("x") -- __call in metatable of class Field > > fields = field() -- __call in metatable of instance of Field > > > > Also changed is that attributes are no longer visible on the class, only > > its instances: > > > > filehandler.read_open = x -- ok, sets callback attribute > > -- previously failed in the setter callback out because "self" is > > -- not a FileHandler instance. Now it will already fail while > > -- looking up the attribute (in the __newindex metamethod). > > FileHandler.read_open = x > > > > > > > > Distinct metatables are good, but what about different method tables? > > The proposal will also disable invocations like Tvb.len(tvb) assuming > > that nobody wants to do it (tvb:len() is saner). > > > > Any objections with removing __setters/__getters/__methods? > > I doubt that dissectors use this. Users can read the WSDG and study the > > source code to discover available functions. > > > > > > Future work, in order (assuming the current proposal): > > - grep for WSLUA_REGISTER_ATTRIBUTES, change their ClassName_register > > functions to use the new wslua_class definition mechanism, including > > setting the "attrs" member. > > - Remove wslua_reg_attributes and macros. > > - grep for WSLUA_REGISTER_META and WSLUA_REGISTER_CLASS to change the > > remaining ClassName_register files. > > > > If you feel that the Lua core code needs some love, help is appreciated > > in these tasks :-) > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Peter Wu > > > > As a non-lua programmer most of that goes straight over my head, but I'm > intrigued\concerned about methods that are class based (i.e. similar to C++ > class static methods ??) and instance based that differ only by the case of > the initial method letter. > > Is this normal for Lua so won't be a surprise for users, or is it likely to > surprise\confuse users and cause lots of issues and support queries? > > -- > Graham Bloice So far all methods have lowercase letters which seems to be a fine convention. If by "case" you refer to the "field" and "Field" examples above, there is a class "Field" that results in an instance "field" on invocation. In C++ you can invoke the static and non-static (instance) methods on an instance, but instance methods cannot be invoked on the class itself: C c; c.static_fn(); // note: in the Lua proposal this is also forbidden c.normal_fn(); C::static_fn(); C::normal_fn(); // error: cannot call member function without object The Lua proposal seems to match Ruby which also distinguishes class methods from normal methods on instances. Unfortunately I was not able to find examples of Lua classes where they class methods in addition to instance methods. What would be intuitive to you? -- Kind regards, Peter Wu https://lekensteyn.nl
- References:
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] gerrit authentication
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 2.2.1 is now available
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Changes to internal Lua classes implementation (Pinfo, TvbRange, etc.)
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-dev] gerrit authentication
- Index(es):