[Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml@xxxxxxxxx>]

During the last Sharkfest, I heard from many users and power-users still some affection to GTK interface. It surprised me a bit, since when I switched to Qt, it was a matter of will. Resistance to change? Maybe. Something not to care about? Surely not. The switch-off of GTK will happen, but... maybe we can try to make it as smooth as possible.

Dario.

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

Even though this is an expected course of events, there is no timeline as of yet. So even though the GTK UI may be lacking features it could still be part of 2.4. So for now it has to remain, and relevant changes should be made not to break it.

Thanks,
Jaap



> On 05 Sep 2016, at 15:06, Roland Knall <rknall@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> As I understand correctly, the gtk interface is being phased out to a point, where it will not be included in 2.4 anymore. I am currently one the brink of adding new features to extcap, and doing so would need me to change some internal interfaces, some of which are used only by the gtk interface.
>
> Should I take the time and fix those, or are the days for the gtk interface numbered anyway and it will be removed in the not-so-near future?
>
> regards
> Roland
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe