[Michal Labedzki <michal.labedzki@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

If I understand correctly it is ok to have custom/vendor for example
XXX dissector, but it name must be different then original dissector.
For example IP dissector. Wireshark has:
> proto_register_protocol("Internet Protocol Version 4", "IPv4", "ip")

So I think about create my custom IP dissector, so all I need to do is:
> proto_register_protocol(" My Internet Protocol Version 4", "My IPv4", "ip")
or better:
> proto_register_protocol(" My Internet Protocol Version 4", "My IPv4", "my_ip")

Then I can use Decode as to choose between builtin "ip" and "my_ip"
dissectors, right?
For example:
  dissector_add_uint("ethertype", ETHERTYPE_IP, ipv4_handle);
  dissector_add_uint("ethertype", ETHERTYPE_IP, my_ip_handle);

If so, I am ok with this change.

On 29 October 2015 at 17:01, Michael Mann <mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I wrote a patch (https://code.wireshark.org/review/1405/) that may require
> discussion, so I thought I'd do it with a broader audience (because it
> impacts many dissectors whose individual authorship doesn't need to be added
> to a single Gerrit review)
>
> The patch fixes bug 3949
> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3949) by enforcing that
> dissector tables that are used by Decode As can't have the same "protocol"
> (name) in multiple entries (exception - FT_STRING because the string value
> is used in the Decode As dialog, not the protocol name).  I've made a few
> patches in the past that fixed some of the duplicates by visual inspection,
> but this patch allows the code to do the work to ensure nothing was missed.
>
> The part I felt was more "up for debate" was that I "defaulted" dissector
> tables to not allow duplicates.  As a test, I made all dissector tables not
> allow duplicates, then used printf and TShark to see how many duplicates
> there were.  If the dissector table wasn't used for Decode As, I would
> switch it to allowing duplicates.  Is that the way to go?  Should I
> "default" FT_STRING dissector tables to always allow duplicates?
>
> The problem is that I'm limited to the dissector source in Wireshark and if
> there are dissector tables with known/intentional third-party dissectors
> with duplicate protocol registration, they will end up getting flagged.  I'd
> like to limit the number of follow-up commits with dissectors being
> corrected for allowing duplicates.  If you have specific dissector tables
> that you think should allow duplicates (or didn't like my "duplicate
> replacement"), please post in the review or email me privately.  The dialog
> I'm going for in the mailing list is for more general approaches (like all
> ASN.1 dissector tables should allow duplicates or you think the "default"
> should be to allow duplicates for all dissector tables)
>
> I also plan to backport this to 2.0 (because I want the API change in there
> before it can't be changed).  Opinions on that welcome as well.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe



-- 

Pozdrawiam / Best regards
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michał Łabędzki, Software Engineer
Tieto Corporation

Product Development Services

http://www.tieto.com / http://www.tieto.pl
---
ASCII: Michal Labedzki
location: Swobodna 1 Street, 50-088 Wrocław, Poland
room: 5.01 (desk next to 5.08)
---
Please note: The information contained in this message may be legally
privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorised use, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank You.
---
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
---
Tieto Poland spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością z siedzibą w
Szczecinie, ul. Malczewskiego 26. Zarejestrowana w Sądzie Rejonowym
Szczecin-Centrum w Szczecinie, XIII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego
Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem 0000124858. NIP: 8542085557. REGON:
812023656. Kapitał zakładowy: 4 271500 PLN