Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wiretap changes for pcapng

From: Hadriel Kaplan <the.real.hadriel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:06:00 -0400
BTW, I think you should propose these as new IDB options on the
pcapng-format mailing list.  They're obviously generally useful things
to have in the file, no matter how wiretap is implemented.

-hadriel


On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We might also have to add new options to the IDB to handle:
>
>         interfaces having separate "friendly name" and "description" strings (which we should do *anyway*), the "friendly name" being a description of what the interface is from the user's point of view and the "description" being a description of the hardware (or, for non-hardware interfaces, software) corresponding to the interface;
>
>         the MTU of the interface;
>
>         a GUID for the interface (at least on Windows; it'd be nice if every OS generated an unchanging GUID for each interface, as I'm sure Jasper Bongertz would agree, but they don't);
>
>         gateway, DHCP server, and DNS server IPv4 and IPv6 addresses;