[João Valverde <joao.valverde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/22/2015 09:29 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Jo�o Valverde
> <joao.valverde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:joao.valverde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     I'm not so sure now that I've done some tests with short and long
>     header chains, I think I'll drop it.
>
> Can you push your proto ? or add some screenshot to see the different ?


For now all I did was:

diff --git a/epan/dissectors/packet-ipv6.c b/epan/dissectors/packet-ipv6.c
index 1c07776..76e5285 100644
--- a/epan/dissectors/packet-ipv6.c
+++ b/epan/dissectors/packet-ipv6.c
@@ -2225,7 +2225,7 @@ dissect_ipv6(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, 
proto_tree *tree)

     if (nxt == IP_PROTO_HOPOPTS) {
         options_tvb = tvb_new_subset_remaining(tvb, offset);
-        advance = dissect_hopopts(options_tvb, pinfo, ipv6_tree, &iph);
+        advance = dissect_hopopts(options_tvb, pinfo, tree, &iph);
         if (advance > 0) {
             nxt = tvb_get_guint8(tvb, offset);
             offset += advance;
@@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ again:
     nxt_handle = 
dissector_get_uint_handle(ipv6_next_header_dissector_table, nxt);

     if ((nxt_handle) &&
-        ((advance = call_dissector_with_data(nxt_handle, options_tvb, 
pinfo, ipv6_tree, &iph)) > 0)) {
+        ((advance = call_dissector_with_data(nxt_handle, options_tvb, 
pinfo, tree, &iph)) > 0)) {
         nxt = tvb_get_guint8(tvb, offset);
         offset += advance;
         plen -= advance;


I had meant to change the ipv6.nxt dissectors to ip.proto but didn't get 
that far.


>     Regards,
>
>     Jo�o V.
>
>
>     On 08/21/2015 06:04 PM, Jo�o Valverde wrote:
>
>         I forgot to include:
>
>         f) it would fix this[1] bug too.
>
>         [1]https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9996
>
>         On 08/21/2015 05:45 PM, Jo�o Valverde wrote:
>
>             Hi,
>
>             I would like to propose a patch to remove IPv6 extension
>             headers from
>             the IPv6 subtree and display them as normal IP protocols in
>             the UI.
>
>             Arguments for:
>
>             a) The current behaviour really, really, (really) hurts
>             legibility
>             b) It would be consistent among all extension headers (see
>             for example
>             MobileIPv6 vs AH - why the difference?)[1]
>             c) Extension headers aren't special in this regard, the IP
>             protocol
>             space is shared
>             d) IPv6 extension headers over IPv4 would be dissected, as
>             they should.
>             An expert info error can then be displayed where appropriate.
>             e) It would do away with the hack (?) used for the AH
>             dissector (I
>             think, I haven't looked very closely yet here).
>
>             Arguments against:
>             ?)
>
>             Would anyone object to this proposal?
>
>             Thanks!
>
>             Jo�o V.
>
>             [1]https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10705
>
>     ___________________________________________________________________________
>     Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>     Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>     Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>                  mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>               mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe