Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors"

From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:45:40 +0100

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Anders Broman <a.broman58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I suspected as much, but I think all the sip lines skip the CRLF...

What about adding the skipped bytes as hidden, labeled as "unused bytes"?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.
  - From: Anders Broman

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.
  - From: Anders Broman
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.
  - From: Dario Lombardo
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.
  - From: Anders Broman

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master 931807e: Qt: Add the "new packet" window^Wdialog^Wwindow.
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] False positive from the new "Look for incomplete dissectors" function.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread