Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Undissected packet bytes

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:22:23 +0100
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As a side note, I would expect that method to be *very* slow, since it
traverses the entire tree for every byte of the packet. Traversing the
tree once and maintaining a set of covered/uncovered ranges would be
much more efficient.

I can't figure out how to traverse the tree once.