Might that be a little hasty to remove the EMEM page so soon? I'm sure there are developers still working with older releases that are using emem. I don't know what information was there or how useful it was compared to the various README's, but presumably it provided additional information beyond what was available anywhere else.
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:45 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] master 7ced085: emem is dead! Long live wmem!
So I deleted the EMEMification page from the wiki but I'm not sure what to do with the Canary page:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Canary
It looks like wmem does use canaries (under some circumstances?) so maybe it shouldn't be deleted. But I'm not familiar enough with what wmem is doing to rewrite it either...
On 02/04/15 10:04, Evan Huus wrote:
> Woohoo!
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Wireshark code review
> <code-review-do-not-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> URL:
>> https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=7
>> ced085550d030ea10525d650c8d5d8dc7c99684
>> Submitter: Anders Broman (a.broman58@xxxxxxxxx)
>> Changed: branch: master
>> Repository: wireshark
>>
>> Commits:
>>
>> 7ced085 by Michael Mann (mmann78@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
>>
>> emem is dead! Long live wmem!
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to this email. Thank you.