On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:06PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
|
| On Jan 3, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Luke Mewburn <luke@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
| > I suspect we need special-case handling in find_conversation() (etc)
| > for PT_TCAP, including possibly a separate hashtable or keeping
| > the TCAP BEGIN in the conversation_hashtable_no_addr2_or_port2 in
| > parallel to the entry in conversation_hashtable_exact.
|
| I suspect what we need is to separate the general concept of
| conversations from the details of particular protocols, so that each
| type of conversation would supply its own matching code.
That sounds better. That could replace the existing special
cases for PT_UDP and AT_FC too.
Attachment:
pgpj6WZ0y3Ned.pgp
Description: PGP signature