[Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@xxxxxxxxx>]

2014-08-25 16:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@xxxxxxxxx>:

Oops, screen shot now attached ...

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Anders Broman
<anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe
> Sent: den 25 augusti 2014 00:06
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad
> dissector additions conform to the spec?
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> I notice, as in the attached screen shot, that the 802.11ad dissector
> additions label the field that the spec (available for free from
> http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11ad-2012.pdf) calls the
> Control Frame Extension simply as the Extension.
>
>
>
> While it could be considered obvious, I tend to believe that it should
> conform fully to the spec.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> Although no screen shot attached, I agree using the name from the spec is
> the way to go.

https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/3916/

Regards,
Pascal.