[Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 8/1/14 9:08 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> On 07/13/14 14:05, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/7/14 9:10 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Alexis La Goutte
>>>>> <alexis.lagoutte@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:alexis.lagoutte@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>      On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>      > It would be nice to have different tags for Refs-Bug and
>>>>>      Fixes-Bug, and have
>>>>>      > the bugzilla integration do The Right Thing for changes that
>>>>> refer
>>>>>      to but do
>>>>>      > not fix a bug. Gerald, how easy is this? I believe OpenStack
>>>>> has a
>>>>>      set of
>>>>>      > tags they use which we might look to for inspiration?
>>>>>      +1
>>>>>      I like OpenStack tags :
>>>>>
>>>>>      Closes-Bug: #1234567 -- use 'Closes-Bug' if the commit is
>>>>> intended
>>>>> to
>>>>>      fully fix and close the bug being referenced.
>>>>>      Partial-Bug: #1234567 -- use 'Partial-Bug' if the commit is
>>>>> only a
>>>>>      partial fix and more work is needed.
>>>>>      Related-Bug: #1234567 -- use 'Related-Bug' if the commit is
>>>>> merely
>>>>>      related to the referenced bug.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GitCommitMessages#Including_external_references
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How would Partial-Bug and Related-Bug differ for our purposes? Wouldn't
>>>> they do the same thing (i.e. add a comment to the bug)? Could we get
>>>> away with two tags:
>>>>
>>>> Ping-Bug: 12345 -- Add a comment to bug 12345
>>>> Bug (or Closes-Bug): 12345 -- Add a comment and mark it RESOLVED FIXED.
>>>
>>>
>>> Just "Ping-Bug" and "Bug" works for me.
>> +1
>> (or Comment-Bug and Closes-Bug ?)
>
> So what are the current set of tags for this?  I tried using Ping-Bug
> (on change 3314) and it ended up closing the bug on me...

Until a few minutes ago any time "bug" followed by a number appeared in
the commit message Gerrit would add a comment and close it. The specific
_javascript_ RE was "\b[Bb]ug:?\s*#?(\d+)\b".

As of now Gerrit should update Bugzilla only for the following footers.
The RE is now "\b(?:[Pp]ing-)?[Bb]ug:?\s*#?(\d+)\b":

Ping-Bug: 12345 -- Only add a comment.
Bug: 12345 -- Add a comment to the bug and close it.

Awesome, thanks!

Just wondering, in hindsight, if we should reverse it so "Closes-Bug" closes and "Bug" just posts a comment. Otherwise I I'm sure somebody will do "blah blah blah like in bug ####" in a commit message and accidentally close that bug.

Thoughts?

Evan